Archive for April, 2006

Back Online

Friday, April 21st, 2006

Yes, I actually made it. I did not touch a computer all day long on Thursday. The worst part was in the evening when there is completely nothing to do and you just crave for a meaningless refresh click on a random web page… but I still made it!

I did not find myself revising more or doing anything special that I do not do regularly cause, except probably of the very long phone call I made yesterday, which was really refreshing. (I can’t believe that people actually stopped calling me.) Nothing else really changed, I went to the library as usualy, I cooked for lunch, I played some DS and read a little bit before going to bed. Nothing really special, I wasted a lot of time doing nothing really in breaks I had between these, I cannot practically live without my computer as I have my calendar online – and I use this to organise my work. A weekly one day off would be nice if I had a proper schedule for that day, and prefereably not at exam time because I need my computer for university work.

Having a one day off is great for getting a new perspective while doing work online, however, I do not think that a time management issue could be solved by having a whole day break, but it would be better made by having a specific part of the day off the machine, for example, not switching the computer on before 4 pm.

Life in Exile

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

I made up my mind to take a great test of courage and endurance. I am going to fight my own temptations to taste the suffering that many people in this world face on daily basis. I am going to abandon a precious part of my life for one day. I will forbid myself from using, interacting with, or even touching any computer for 24 hours.

I am an addict to the little plastic keys that I regularly refer to as the ‘Piano’. The first thing that I touch in the morning is not an alarm clock, not a tooth brush, or a glass of water. It is the mouse of my computer. My little musical instrument is my constant companion, no other being could possibly stand having me with him for all this time. I am grateful for all the days of joy we shared together, but I have come to this moment where I have to move on, see if I can live by myself without you my bestfriend. I would like to see if I can endure 24 hours on my own.

It’s funny how I always thought that I can do a 24-hours-online rally if I wanted to, but now that I want to abandon computers and the internet for 24 hours it sounds really hard. A friend already said that I will fail, but I really think that I spend way too much time on my machine… I do not always waste time when I am online, but I still think that I need a break to get a fresh new perspective… If this succeeds, I might take a day off every week. And who knows, I might find a more enjoyable musical instrument outside the virtual world.

I will switch off my laptop today before I got to bed, and I will switch it back on on Friday (That’ll be more than 24 hours!)

Silly Forum People

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

I am starting to get really pissed of those silly forum members that threaten to leave a forum because they are dissatisfied with something, we always try our best to make everyone happy, but if you don’t like it, well, I’m sorry to say this, but you can just fuck off. Seriously, it is not like we’re begging you to stay or that you are a golden member that makes people come to the forum just to read your posts. It will be nice if those people stayed, but if you don’t like the place, just leave, we do not need your warnings, and believe me, we’ll do just as fine whether you stayed or left.

P!NK – I’m Not Dead

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

Pink is not dead at all, her music is more inspirational than ever as she explores love, survival, loneliness, politics, fame, and sex. “I’m Not Dead” is an awesome rock/pop album that brings back more of the ‘Missundaztood‘ Pink than any of her other reflections. It took me a whole week to get the strength to actually stop playing “I’m Not Dead”. This is clearly my favourite album in 2006 until now.

1. Stupid Girls
2. Who Knew
3. Long Way To Happy
4. Nobody Knows
5. Dear Mr President – Pink & Indigo Girls
6. I’m Not Dead
7. Cuz I Can
8. Leave Me Alone (I’m Lonely)
9. U + Ur Hand
10. Runaway
11. One That Got Away
12. I Got Money Now
13. Conversations With My 13 Year Old Self
14. Fingers
15. Centerfold
16. I Have Seen The Rain

Basic Introduction to Income Tax

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

The tax legislation is now being rewritten through the Tax Rewrite Project. ITEPA 2003 covers legislation in relation to the taxation of employees, while ITTOIA 05 covers the taxation of sole traders. Different activities are taxed under different ‘schedules’ in the tax legislation, those have been reallocated as parts of ITTOIA and ITEPA.

The previous Schedule 1 (case 1 and 2) for sole traders are now present in Part II of ITTOIA. Case 3 of this schedule regarding interest is present in Parts IV and V of the ITTOIA. Cases 4 and 5 on foreign source income are not present as the concept of these has changed. Case 6 regarding other sources of income is in Part V Chapter 8 of ITTOA.

Schedule E regarding employees is in ITEPA 2003, and Schedule F regarding company distributions is now in Part IV Chapter 3 to 8 of ITTOIA.

ITTOIA applies only to income tax of sole traders and does not apply for corporation tax, which is still covered by ICTA 1988. However, companies compute their taxable profits under the same rules as individuals.

For the year 05/06 there are 3 main rates for income tax, the starting rate is 10% for income profit that is less than £2,091. The rate for income profit between £2,091 and £32,400 is 22%, while the rate for profit greater than £32,400 is 40%.

Tax used to be collected by the Inland Revenue, but its function has now been undertaken by the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Tax is calculated per year, the tax year starts from April 6th and finishes on April 5th. (Fiscal Year) Companies on other hand compute their tax on the Financial Year which begins on the 1st of March and ends on the 31st of April.

What are ESCs? Those are decisions by the revenue not to implement the full rigour of the law, but instead make a concession in favour of the taxpayer and tax him under less severe provisions that te law requires.

Appeals
Appeals from the Revenue go initially to two types of commissioners. The General Commissioners and the Special Commissioners. The GC are lay people with no specialised skill that deal with less controversial appeals which are mostly issues of fact. The SC are experts in law and deal with questions of law and lengthy appeals. The taxpayer can choose which to use, but if no election to the SC was made then the GC will hear it. The General and Special Commissioners have co-ordinate jurisdiction and there is no appeal from one body to the other. The appeal from commissioners decision on a question of fact is final. The appeal is therefore on a point of law only. The initial appeal from the commissioners will be to the High Court, the appeal from there would be prohibited by the new Access to Justice Act (two levels of appeal only) unless the Court of Appeal allows it itself and this license will only be grated if the issue is an important point of principle, or because of some other compelling reason.

Studying law could actually get pretty hectic.

Sunday, April 16th, 2006

…. and I haven’t even started revising for my exams yet.

Freej – The First 3D Animation Series in the Gulf

Saturday, April 15th, 2006

I’ve written a small article about a new animated series to be aired on Dubai TV next Ramadhan, check it out at this link!

New Christina Aguilera + Elissa Pepsi Commercial

Saturday, April 8th, 2006

Being a huge fan of both artists this sounds too good to be true, but it actually happened. You can view the commercial here, it features a new song by Christina titled “Here to Stay”.

I found this at O.C.

Defamation – Part I

Wednesday, April 5th, 2006

The law of defamation is a law the protects unjustified attacks on reputation. There is a constant battle between the desire of the society to be aware of events they are interested in and the need of the individual to be protected against the invasion of personal privacy and the publication of untrue or damaging remarks.

Defamation is a serious curb to media freedom in the UK as every stage of the publication or broadcasting process could be held liable. There is no requirement for the defendant to intend defamation.

There are several requirements for someone to be able to claim a successful claim in defamation:

  1. A statement communicated to a third party (publication must be a third party other than D’s spouse.)

  2. this statement must refer to the claimant. The claimant has to be alive. It is not a defence that C is not referred by name if he would be capable of being identified by the reasonable person. The words could be taken to refer to C if he’s mentioned by name even if D did not intend it. In the case of Hulton v Jones [1910] D was held liable when the name of a fictional character matched the name of a real person. If the statement defamed a class of people, C must be prove that he is identifiable individually within the group for him to be able to make an action. Case: Aiken and Others v Police Review Publishing Co Ltd. (Action failed). A legal person such as a Company can sue and be sued for defamation, but a local authority or a governmental dept cannot sue but can be sued.
  3. this statement must be in the form of words that does one of the following:
    1. Lower the claimant in the estimation of normal right-thinking people.
    2. Expose C to hatred, contempt or ridicule.
    3. Cause C to be shunned or avoided.

The jury should consider the natural and ordinary meaning to the ordinary, reasonable and fair minded-reader who is not unduly suspicious but nor is he unduly naive. He can and does read between the lines and should not select one bad meaning where non-defamatory meanings are available – reasonable reader test. Case: Hartt v Newspaper Publishing Plc. What is defamatory can change from time to time, eg. Calling someone a ‘German’ after WW was offensive case: Slazengers Ltd v Gibbs & Co [1916], calling someone gay is not defamatory because it is now widely accepted, unless of this would imply the dishonesty of C.

In the case of Berkoff v Burchill [1977], the statement that described the claimant as ugly was held to be defamatory was it exposed C to ridicule. But in the case of Normal v Future Publishing Ltd [1998], a statement that illustrated a stereotypical image of the claimant’s race was held to be humourous and not defamatory. (The comment was about a C black woman saying ‘Honey, I aint got no sideways’.)

It is important to note that a comment could be defamatory even when its true (But the defendant will have a defence), and it would not necessarily be defamatory just because it is not true.

New Competition at Oman3D

Sunday, April 2nd, 2006


We are giving a Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children DVD for the person that can make us the coolest FF wallpaper, read all the details here.


Blue_Chi's Blog © 2009 - Riyadh Al-Balushi | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License | RSS